thanks to
The Colbert Report &
Mitt Romney***
(not to mention Aaron Sorkin)
MR-RM???
Rupert Murdock
Rachell Maddow
Cowpie Central ?
RL LR
Liaison Report!
[SEGUE]
Now I have stepped in it.
I could not have more Turd Blossoms** for The Newsroom.
Network meets Countdown for blastoff!*
HBO meets Swift Dawn Keys!
* I re-craft any Molotov metaphors.
** Not to Mitt-Flop stars or thumbs.
[Seriously, I could not have been more thrilled with the first episode of The Newswroom.
From the producer of The West Wing, an HBO drama begins for the field of TV journalism. The first episode and special features are available in the Top Picks section of Xfinity OnDemand even without an HBO subscription.]
*** I must eventually thank someone for playing a ColbertReport clip.
[UP?]
7-1-12
[The Newsroom, will get your patriotc juices flowing for the hope and changey thing of Edward R. Murrow.]
[Not exactly Good Timing ! Where's the party AT? ]
Saturday, June 30, 2012
Friday, June 29, 2012
Follow...up or Down.
Follow-Up or down?
The voodoo that some do do.
Including 9-11 and a horse of course, about the rule* of law?
DR-Deficit Reduction
NOW-"It's Complicated."
* not to pun on run down, but Thomas Roberts Rules,
[water gate ? B S: Uphold or Holdup?]
[ MSNBCTV is Thomas Roberts: live rule yesterday Jansing &Co Re:action swing flop De:volve Thomas Roberts ! ]
[Huff Times, AM**, Salon. NG v GN]
**Ruth Marcus: Obama Legacy? Re-do?
[ Politics Revisited / R M ? ! NewsNation M M. Jobs / Freedom ?]
[OK, the above line is as boggled as anything, but it is about the nature of the process and reality or the politics and die manics(to parse the dynamics or how of the beef) which is still spinning on The Cycle. The Supreme Court is not a dictionary. Justice Roberts reportedly did not say it was tax. But Republicans need to see things black and white or they can't uphold their politics of holdup.***]
[Fee Fi Foe FUMM? MB on Mitt the Mandatious(ChamberMade). Fear and uh...
MR
RM.. uh, Martin Bashir pre-CP. Mitt the Moderate? ]
*** Again, sorry for getting caught up in the pun and parsing of politics. It comes down to one word: running. Running the government or running for office. Another word: table. Oops. What is on the table? Do we want them running the table? Obama ran to put it all on the table and Republicans want to run the table.
The voodoo that some do do.
Including 9-11 and a horse of course, about the rule* of law?
DR-Deficit Reduction
NOW-"It's Complicated."
* not to pun on run down, but Thomas Roberts Rules,
[water gate ? B S: Uphold or Holdup?]
[ MSNBCTV is Thomas Roberts: live rule yesterday Jansing &Co Re:action swing flop De:volve Thomas Roberts ! ]
[Huff Times, AM**, Salon. NG v GN]
**Ruth Marcus: Obama Legacy? Re-do?
[ Politics Revisited / R M ? ! NewsNation M M. Jobs / Freedom ?]
[OK, the above line is as boggled as anything, but it is about the nature of the process and reality or the politics and die manics(to parse the dynamics or how of the beef) which is still spinning on The Cycle. The Supreme Court is not a dictionary. Justice Roberts reportedly did not say it was tax. But Republicans need to see things black and white or they can't uphold their politics of holdup.***]
[Fee Fi Foe FUMM? MB on Mitt the Mandatious(ChamberMade). Fear and uh...
MR
RM.. uh, Martin Bashir pre-CP. Mitt the Moderate? ]
*** Again, sorry for getting caught up in the pun and parsing of politics. It comes down to one word: running. Running the government or running for office. Another word: table. Oops. What is on the table? Do we want them running the table? Obama ran to put it all on the table and Republicans want to run the table.
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Democracy Upheld! (5-4) (R/x)**
Not to spike the ball.
Mandate will become a tax!
Well... that was my idea or interpretation of the bill, but that was FOX News' claim.
But my original ball that might have been a spike was "Democrats Upheld" but Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act, is a bi-partisan bill, so I cannot claim a victory for Democrats. It is a victory for congress and the political progress. It is a victory for Obama and bi-partisanship. Not that victory is a Burger King*, or having it my way. I should admit that recently I thought that part of the ruling would be kicking the can down the road, since some of the provisions don't go into effect till 2014.
Oops, in plain English, I may have been right about the can.
Senator Dan Coates on Jansing&Co. claimed lack of bi-partisanship. That claim is a victory for politics and bi-partisanship. The ACA was passed under reconciliation. It was not a Democratic bill, but a democratic bill. If the President can be blamed(see choice/bold-underlined) for congress not getting things done, when the Republicans obstruct with filibusters. Republicans cannot have all the changes they could get and not take credit for them by voting against the bill to claim partisanship by not being able to filibuster.
If anything this is a vaccine to the insanity of the partisan Issa Committee which doctor for the NRA.
Pump it up! Obama Cares ! Chris Matthews has a very interesting Stupid Conspiracy. On the other hand, I thought that the obvious was missing in the court arguments. I think that means that it was plain that a loss of tax break is not a penalty, or is it the semantics of taxes.
* whose weigh or beef?
** still looking for the bullet ratio aka up 'n over or held/turned [People/$]
[of and for the people, over money]
[The real in'f-fable might be taxes/commerce. The High Five ? 4GETIT?
It is a win for Politics, Bi-Partisanship, Obama, and the Economy! But according to Raw Money? "A Choice"... between Government standing between you and big corporations or big corporations standing between you and your health care.(Bold over underlined ? )]
Not to strike a punchline, but bottomline: Obama is Bush! A Political Capitalist!
Romney is Kerry! A nuanced flip-flopper. But only in the light of...(the president speaks)***
(asterisked anachronism888baneORspeaks.)
*** TBA
[Coff E T A B L E ]
[AM H&H game change? Tweet Morning Joe! ET? MR doc RM RL btw: NFIB v. SSHH$ ]
[PC v MF ! (?)]
(photo credit)
[Hi5-4th'tableCongressISjobWON!]
[Congress is open to a peel!]
[I don't have the rest of the story to back this up, but I think that Norman Goldman analyzes NFIB v. SSHHS the way I have. Not only that but Justice Thomas or the D$ent may have bust the fallacy that health care is commerce. Not only that but I think that Justice Roberts figured out how it can work or not work depending on congress, as I think that congress could have if they had more cooperation rather than partisanship. NorMan really cut through it with a caller, regarding small business and Mitt RobbedMe. How do you know when Mitt is telling a lie? He is either talking about Obama or economics, if not both at the same time. Just between me and we, it seems that without fully reading the Affordable Care Act or the full decision, the Supreme Court seems to have understood it better than it was argued, but not much more than I thought it was. The catch is that we are patching together various interpretations that make a decision that still takes some tweaking by congress. It puts taxes and states at the table. The catch seems to hinge on the powers of congress and the definition of commerce. As Chris Matthews was want to call it a Stupid Conspiracy, I may lean toward calling it a Swift Strategy, despite the games some play with acronyms, initialism or caricatures.]
NG
GN
UP v UC
Unprecedent President vis a vis Unprecedented Congress.
Now that is PC! Due(or vu doo) the Math!
(Bush/Obama x Obstructive/Health Care)
[I would like to thank three people for helping me understand GeOhMeTry[!] Randi Rhodes, Lawrence O'Donnel and Michael [links 6-29] Moore... Well...there are host of others but in particular RR and LO, have brilliant insight if not intel. Randi a quick take on Obama, Lawrence an understanding of the political process, and MM a way with the message and the medium. MR-RM.
Plausible Deniability/Plausible Incompetence/ Deniable Competence. That is the voodoo some do.
[Upheld - U p h e l d !]
Mandate will become a tax!
Well... that was my idea or interpretation of the bill, but that was FOX News' claim.
But my original ball that might have been a spike was "Democrats Upheld" but Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act, is a bi-partisan bill, so I cannot claim a victory for Democrats. It is a victory for congress and the political progress. It is a victory for Obama and bi-partisanship. Not that victory is a Burger King*, or having it my way. I should admit that recently I thought that part of the ruling would be kicking the can down the road, since some of the provisions don't go into effect till 2014.
Oops, in plain English, I may have been right about the can.
Senator Dan Coates on Jansing&Co. claimed lack of bi-partisanship. That claim is a victory for politics and bi-partisanship. The ACA was passed under reconciliation. It was not a Democratic bill, but a democratic bill. If the President can be blamed(see choice/bold-underlined) for congress not getting things done, when the Republicans obstruct with filibusters. Republicans cannot have all the changes they could get and not take credit for them by voting against the bill to claim partisanship by not being able to filibuster.
If anything this is a vaccine to the insanity of the partisan Issa Committee which doctor for the NRA.
Pump it up! Obama Cares ! Chris Matthews has a very interesting Stupid Conspiracy. On the other hand, I thought that the obvious was missing in the court arguments. I think that means that it was plain that a loss of tax break is not a penalty, or is it the semantics of taxes.
* whose weigh or beef?
** still looking for the bullet ratio aka up 'n over or held/turned [People/$]
[of and for the people, over money]
[The real in'f-fable might be taxes/commerce. The High Five ? 4GETIT?
It is a win for Politics, Bi-Partisanship, Obama, and the Economy! But according to Raw Money? "A Choice"... between Government standing between you and big corporations or big corporations standing between you and your health care.(Bold over underlined ? )]
Not to strike a punchline, but bottomline: Obama is Bush! A Political Capitalist!
Romney is Kerry! A nuanced flip-flopper. But only in the light of...(the president speaks)***
(asterisked anachronism888baneORspeaks.)
*** TBA
[Coff E T A B L E ]
[AM H&H game change? Tweet Morning Joe! ET? MR doc RM RL btw: NFIB v. SSHH$ ]
[PC v MF ! (?)]
(photo credit)
[Hi5-4th'tableCongressISjobWON!]
[Congress is open to a peel!]
[I don't have the rest of the story to back this up, but I think that Norman Goldman analyzes NFIB v. SSHHS the way I have. Not only that but Justice Thomas or the D$ent may have bust the fallacy that health care is commerce. Not only that but I think that Justice Roberts figured out how it can work or not work depending on congress, as I think that congress could have if they had more cooperation rather than partisanship. NorMan really cut through it with a caller, regarding small business and Mitt RobbedMe. How do you know when Mitt is telling a lie? He is either talking about Obama or economics, if not both at the same time. Just between me and we, it seems that without fully reading the Affordable Care Act or the full decision, the Supreme Court seems to have understood it better than it was argued, but not much more than I thought it was. The catch is that we are patching together various interpretations that make a decision that still takes some tweaking by congress. It puts taxes and states at the table. The catch seems to hinge on the powers of congress and the definition of commerce. As Chris Matthews was want to call it a Stupid Conspiracy, I may lean toward calling it a Swift Strategy, despite the games some play with acronyms, initialism or caricatures.]
NG
GN
UP v UC
Unprecedent President vis a vis Unprecedented Congress.
Now that is PC! Due(or vu doo) the Math!
(Bush/Obama x Obstructive/Health Care)
[I would like to thank three people for helping me understand GeOhMeTry[!] Randi Rhodes, Lawrence O'Donnel and Michael [links 6-29] Moore... Well...there are host of others but in particular RR and LO, have brilliant insight if not intel. Randi a quick take on Obama, Lawrence an understanding of the political process, and MM a way with the message and the medium. MR-RM.
Plausible Deniability/Plausible Incompetence/ Deniable Competence. That is the voodoo some do.
[Upheld - U p h e l d !]
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Sunday, June 24, 2012
Enough Smirking!
The Sport of Stairs!
Well
... a bit of a Tan gent.
Not [!]
[This is a bit of a Mitt-Flop from a long story short. But you learn something everyday. In my case it is very embarassing, having constucted a home, that yes it is proper to use a stair for a step, as long as you don't trip. Not to mention where I may have gone if I had had more sports. But if it is not too late, don't miss the Stairs link. It covers one of several topics covered at a weekend get together with friends. Taxes that is. Not to mention dressage*. Little did I know that I actually know someone who participates in that sport.]
* well not in the same link, don't forget the sport.
6-25-12 ["a" / "gent" brackets the meta 4, not to mention hard ware or punchline.]
Not my original intent [!][?][?]
[But certainly part of the puzzle, is immigration and citizens united and who cares! Nail? Emigration is as important as immigration, no new taxes does not mean old taxes aren't fine and public option is not a man date or woe man.]
[RM Nix On MR /on M B]
[I of Needle ? ... One legged** coffee table! "Papers Please Ruling." Take 3/4?]
** This originated in a pun on Brewer and the SCOTUS in their two rulings today. Three of the four key ingredients of 1070 were over-turned and the only one standing duplicates federal law. So basically it was overturned and leaves the state with existing law. In the Citizens United/Montana ruling federal law was upheld as well, or rather state law was over-turned as well. To keep this from getting messy, I will simply insert a few Ed Schultz links.
6-26-12 Robert Reich on the same page.
LA Times "reality check".
G P S Cross Rhodes ?
Nav Grid ? / Ambiguous De- sign. (ouch ?)
[Ambiguous Muddle: Andrea Mitchell*** NoPR]
*** Ctrl F "inconvenient" "follow-up" of No Labels BS
Hell***N?
AM AG Definition Gap! Atlantic Pacific / Oceans Don't Protect Us.
[Issa attacks Obama Weakness: C-NewsNation (not looking back @ B*S*)
Hunch Left on the Table. "Court of Public Opinion" Bin/go!
Cause Ma*l Oh Ge!]
[Note: last four uses of asterisks are simply place holders, as in the last case for "u" or "l" or even no place holder. Not to mention ! Spin Cycle ?
Alternate Legs ?]
[Newt Romney Business Man (Green Economy)(Read Levi a thon)?]
[Victory VictiMothy: '68 yada yada]
Well
... a bit of a Tan gent.
Not [!]
[This is a bit of a Mitt-Flop from a long story short. But you learn something everyday. In my case it is very embarassing, having constucted a home, that yes it is proper to use a stair for a step, as long as you don't trip. Not to mention where I may have gone if I had had more sports. But if it is not too late, don't miss the Stairs link. It covers one of several topics covered at a weekend get together with friends. Taxes that is. Not to mention dressage*. Little did I know that I actually know someone who participates in that sport.]
* well not in the same link, don't forget the sport.
6-25-12 ["a" / "gent" brackets the meta 4, not to mention hard ware or punchline.]
Not my original intent [!][?][?]
[But certainly part of the puzzle, is immigration and citizens united and who cares! Nail? Emigration is as important as immigration, no new taxes does not mean old taxes aren't fine and public option is not a man date or woe man.]
[RM Nix On MR /on M B]
[I of Needle ? ... One legged** coffee table! "Papers Please Ruling." Take 3/4?]
** This originated in a pun on Brewer and the SCOTUS in their two rulings today. Three of the four key ingredients of 1070 were over-turned and the only one standing duplicates federal law. So basically it was overturned and leaves the state with existing law. In the Citizens United/Montana ruling federal law was upheld as well, or rather state law was over-turned as well. To keep this from getting messy, I will simply insert a few Ed Schultz links.
6-26-12 Robert Reich on the same page.
LA Times "reality check".
G P S Cross Rhodes ?
Nav Grid ? / Ambiguous De- sign. (ouch ?)
[Ambiguous Muddle: Andrea Mitchell*** NoPR]
*** Ctrl F "inconvenient" "follow-up" of No Labels BS
Hell***N?
AM AG Definition Gap! Atlantic Pacific / Oceans Don't Protect Us.
[Issa attacks Obama Weakness: C-NewsNation (not looking back @ B*S*)
Hunch Left on the Table. "Court of Public Opinion" Bin/go!
Cause Ma*l Oh Ge!]
[Note: last four uses of asterisks are simply place holders, as in the last case for "u" or "l" or even no place holder. Not to mention ! Spin Cycle ?
Alternate Legs ?]
[Newt Romney Business Man (Green Economy)(Read Levi a thon)?]
[Victory VictiMothy: '68 yada yada]
Thursday, June 21, 2012
Smirking Gun[!]
OK, I won't overuse the term smoking gun, but when I heard Senator McCain's leak theory, I knew something was up. "The only conceivable" reason that McCain knows the "motive for such damaging and compromising leaks" is that it is something he could conceive of doing. The Issa cover-up committee is along the same track. Worse than Watergate, less than WMD***.
September 11th occurred because the Bush administration had contempt for the Clinton administration and refused to carry on in the case against terrorism. Fast and Furious is still under investigation, but it seems that the political case is of the opposite extreme. The Obama administration not changing more from the previous administration.
I have a feeling that the Issa Committee investigation is actually an attempt to interfere with the Obama administration* of justice and foreign policy. Or retribution for Watergate, Iran Contra and Plame combined, or Republican power** as usual.
* Ctrl F "obstructionism"
** now that is the ticket or subpoena(Thom Hartmann)
*** 6-22-12 Pre-Post-or-us?
(I was reticent to use 9/11, especially with the smoking[!] gun lede-in. While Representative Mica is really stretching things, two things are certain. September 11th or even a dead ATF agent are nothing to smirk about, and Representative Issa hides his smirk with a snear.)
[Related posts: Re:investigation, Re:dribble, Re-course, Re:turn(Ctrl F "sabotage" "pate")]
[GPS for MSNBC labels?]
[!] really sic, i.e. no typo, nor disrespect for the departed intended
[A caller to the Ed Schultz show noted a similar theme. Republicans are more about obstruction politics than finding the facts. They must have something to hide. Obama's success and their incompetence. But then there followed**2 on Thom Hartmann the PE/FDR/BS [!]]
[It is on !]
[A friend asked my opinion on the wikileaks deal. Well more specifically the personalities involved. Bottomline, I don't feel that military personel should take it on themselve to leak top secret information without considering the consequences, nor should they have been distributed without the same considerations. Unfortunately there may not be enough law on the books to prosecute the latter although there certainly is for the former. Who do we have to blame for the laws on the books? Congress. Who do we have for not enough laws on the books? Republicans. Well, it is not the quantity but the quality. But the answer is the same. Talk is cheap, but actions*2 cost.]
*2 accidental link
[Weird link of the day.]
**2 with all due respect for B.S. it was the PE crack by FDR (Privileged Enterprise)
[Not so weird link of day.]
September 11th occurred because the Bush administration had contempt for the Clinton administration and refused to carry on in the case against terrorism. Fast and Furious is still under investigation, but it seems that the political case is of the opposite extreme. The Obama administration not changing more from the previous administration.
I have a feeling that the Issa Committee investigation is actually an attempt to interfere with the Obama administration* of justice and foreign policy. Or retribution for Watergate, Iran Contra and Plame combined, or Republican power** as usual.
* Ctrl F "obstructionism"
** now that is the ticket or subpoena(Thom Hartmann)
*** 6-22-12 Pre-Post-or-us?
(I was reticent to use 9/11, especially with the smoking[!] gun lede-in. While Representative Mica is really stretching things, two things are certain. September 11th or even a dead ATF agent are nothing to smirk about, and Representative Issa hides his smirk with a snear.)
[Related posts: Re:investigation, Re:dribble, Re-course, Re:turn(Ctrl F "sabotage" "pate")]
[GPS for MSNBC labels?]
[!] really sic, i.e. no typo, nor disrespect for the departed intended
[A caller to the Ed Schultz show noted a similar theme. Republicans are more about obstruction politics than finding the facts. They must have something to hide. Obama's success and their incompetence. But then there followed**2 on Thom Hartmann the PE/FDR/BS [!]]
[It is on !]
[A friend asked my opinion on the wikileaks deal. Well more specifically the personalities involved. Bottomline, I don't feel that military personel should take it on themselve to leak top secret information without considering the consequences, nor should they have been distributed without the same considerations. Unfortunately there may not be enough law on the books to prosecute the latter although there certainly is for the former. Who do we have to blame for the laws on the books? Congress. Who do we have for not enough laws on the books? Republicans. Well, it is not the quantity but the quality. But the answer is the same. Talk is cheap, but actions*2 cost.]
*2 accidental link
[Weird link of the day.]
**2 with all due respect for B.S. it was the PE crack by FDR (Privileged Enterprise)
[Not so weird link of day.]
Sunday, June 17, 2012
Choice v. Referendum
The choice is between looking back or going back. Between Obama's turnaround and Raw Money's turnaround. The economy has turned around and Obama can claim his second term. The economy may turnaround* either way, but it does depend on actions and even inactions, not just words. Ravi Batra predicts a double dip before the November election but also a recovery next administration. So talk may be cheap, but it does depend on who you listen to***, and who we follow.
* Ravi Batra(2:06) on Thom Hartmann (also see 2:00 news of 3 hr show)
6-18-12 Mitt Romney health care comments ?
Not to make it a referendum on(awkward segue/lost line**) Obamacares v. Romneycare.
Choice is Greek to too many.
** only partial rethread, with awkwardness regarding the choice/referendum irony, not related to the eventual links here.
*** 6-19-12 Not FOX! Not Really!
A horse is a horse of course of course unless you're a Plato or Romney of course.
6-20-12 Re: De-funding?
"Sad day" for dribble [!]
What's the dribble? Not to be ironic. It's politics on the table, in regard to contempt of process.
6-21-12 The dribble ?
Politics Nation "Fast and Furious" [N BA: not to ribble]
Awkward Segue: **2
Bread and circuses*2 to a whole new level. Duoh!
Now there's the rub.
*2 Unless you're Mr. Ed!
**2 This line was insert after getting to the rub, not to mention the bread line or leveled links.
* Ravi Batra(2:06) on Thom Hartmann (also see 2:00 news of 3 hr show)
6-18-12 Mitt Romney health care comments ?
Not to make it a referendum on(awkward segue/lost line**) Obamacares v. Romneycare.
Choice is Greek to too many.
** only partial rethread, with awkwardness regarding the choice/referendum irony, not related to the eventual links here.
*** 6-19-12 Not FOX! Not Really!
A horse is a horse of course of course unless you're a Plato or Romney of course.
6-20-12 Re: De-funding?
"Sad day" for dribble [!]
What's the dribble? Not to be ironic. It's politics on the table, in regard to contempt of process.
6-21-12 The dribble ?
Politics Nation "Fast and Furious" [N BA: not to ribble]
Awkward Segue: **2
Bread and circuses*2 to a whole new level. Duoh!
Now there's the rub.
*2 Unless you're Mr. Ed!
**2 This line was insert after getting to the rub, not to mention the bread line or leveled links.
Friday, June 15, 2012
Contempt for Courage
President Obama is taking Congress(**B) and* Romney on head-on.
Republicans are all about the politics of opposition. Democrats are all about the politics of getting things done.(*B) But there are limits, and they are in the constitution and the three branches of government. Now that is not a very satisfying thing. Congress makes the laws, and the president must follow them, and they will not change until they are broken. Republicans will take the country down while the president has all the tools at his disposal to make sure they don't succeed. Of course it is under the guise of a disagreement, but is a disguise that the people must see through.
A look back** is called for because that is where not keeping the change will take us. Has there not been enough change? Well just asking the question reminds me of the last administrations Secretary of Defense and his questioning and answering*** himself. I really don't want to go there.
But the recent Fed mention of the loss of wealth in the last 20 years, parallels the dine and dash that has been a Republican solution that has not been removed from the table. Democrats have fought wars and built the middle-class, while Republicans have cut checks and unbalanced the nation.
Is the President doing as much as some would like? As it becomes more clear that Republicans will not, now is the time that he must.
[Hardball "Two Americas" Walsh / Feerey - Romney is not on the ballot? The Act Act.]
* 6-16-12 link moved back one word(bold added)(Also [Hardball] links)
("Romney" to "and")
** Ctrl F "bite"
*** Ctrl F "Rumsfeld"
(*B) Go jump in the Lakoff(i.e. Ctrl F Lakoff)(oops)
(**B) two links added @"taking Congress"& @Romney reinsert new link
(***B) NFRY & vice verse us (or chicken or egg*c)
[UP w/ Chris Hayes(***B) Stand Your Ground and De-Policing.]
Hint: v.c.(not very crispy)
*c literally
Republicans are all about the politics of opposition. Democrats are all about the politics of getting things done.(*B) But there are limits, and they are in the constitution and the three branches of government. Now that is not a very satisfying thing. Congress makes the laws, and the president must follow them, and they will not change until they are broken. Republicans will take the country down while the president has all the tools at his disposal to make sure they don't succeed. Of course it is under the guise of a disagreement, but is a disguise that the people must see through.
A look back** is called for because that is where not keeping the change will take us. Has there not been enough change? Well just asking the question reminds me of the last administrations Secretary of Defense and his questioning and answering*** himself. I really don't want to go there.
But the recent Fed mention of the loss of wealth in the last 20 years, parallels the dine and dash that has been a Republican solution that has not been removed from the table. Democrats have fought wars and built the middle-class, while Republicans have cut checks and unbalanced the nation.
Is the President doing as much as some would like? As it becomes more clear that Republicans will not, now is the time that he must.
[Hardball "Two Americas" Walsh / Feerey - Romney is not on the ballot? The Act Act.]
* 6-16-12 link moved back one word(bold added)(Also [Hardball] links)
("Romney" to "and")
** Ctrl F "bite"
*** Ctrl F "Rumsfeld"
(*B) Go jump in the Lakoff(i.e. Ctrl F Lakoff)(oops)
(**B) two links added @"taking Congress"& @Romney reinsert new link
(***B) NFRY & vice verse us (or chicken or egg*c)
[UP w/ Chris Hayes(***B) Stand Your Ground and De-Policing.]
Hint: v.c.(not very crispy)
*c literally
Romney Mumbles Economy
"It's coming back." Cincinatti
verse us
Obama turns it around...in Cleveland.
[Comments filed yesterday: Norman Goldman President had congress**? Mitt Robney,
If it is possible to be wrong in two dimensions, Raw Money might be able. At least he is wrong twice in one claim in regards to Obama and the economic turn around. But while two wrongs don’t make a right. Two rights do make a turn around, but not two lefts. Well it is a matter of degrees. (‘scuse me Mitt RobbedMe*)
Anyway, back to the two wrongs, A.) the President can’t turn the economy around, congress passes all legislation. B.) the economy has turned around. C.) turning it around again will be the wrong direction. D.) There is plenty of turn left.
There is plenty of dispute about how and how much to turn. There is even plenty of dispute as to how much it was turned. But there is no disputing that the economy has been turned around and it is still being turned.]
* Wed. & Thurs. openings
** not frackin' really
[Of course it was mumbled(aka nuanced), it was anachronistic, dependent on looking back.]
http://www.electmitt2012.org/ Quote: "Mitt Romney is focused on implementing a set of conservative principles to reinforce the America we once knew."
Mitt might just be me, but I find it hard to find the Cincinnati speech in full text or video.
Romney Pac Charlie Brown ads running on or from Congressional Budget acts. Choice or Referendum? Compare or Retreat.
Martin Bashir
Lawrence O'Donnell
verse us
Obama turns it around...in Cleveland.
[Comments filed yesterday: Norman Goldman President had congress**? Mitt Robney,
If it is possible to be wrong in two dimensions, Raw Money might be able. At least he is wrong twice in one claim in regards to Obama and the economic turn around. But while two wrongs don’t make a right. Two rights do make a turn around, but not two lefts. Well it is a matter of degrees. (‘scuse me Mitt RobbedMe*)
Anyway, back to the two wrongs, A.) the President can’t turn the economy around, congress passes all legislation. B.) the economy has turned around. C.) turning it around again will be the wrong direction. D.) There is plenty of turn left.
There is plenty of dispute about how and how much to turn. There is even plenty of dispute as to how much it was turned. But there is no disputing that the economy has been turned around and it is still being turned.]
As for "Talk is cheap"? ** Just ask Wisconsin and the V.A., not to mention the middle-class and home equity. Bubble-up is more economical than trickle-down.
* Wed. & Thurs. openings
** not frackin' really
[Of course it was mumbled(aka nuanced), it was anachronistic, dependent on looking back.]
http://www.electmitt2012.org/ Quote: "Mitt Romney is focused on implementing a set of conservative principles to reinforce the America we once knew."
Mitt might just be me, but I find it hard to find the Cincinnati speech in full text or video.
Romney Pac Charlie Brown ads running on or from Congressional Budget acts. Choice or Referendum? Compare or Retreat.
Martin Bashir
Lawrence O'Donnell
Friday, June 08, 2012
It's Obama's Turn
[Keep the Change(scroll down)]
Of course.
Stay the course.
The private* sector is fine
verse US economic turn around.
[Hardball Metaphor. Making the case.***]
* E. G. Private Equity Government
(The nuts and bolts? If Romney cannot understand that the economy has turned around, then what will happen when he turns it around.)
[Ouch ! ]
[Politics Nation ? ]
[Whip Republicans with Reagan and Clinton!]
Thom Hartmann?
Word of tomorrow? Pernicious.**
[Coffee Table This! The Fifth Element.]
6-10-12 Keep the Change!
Yes this is a bumper sticker for Obama! Though the links may be a bumper sticker for Clinton or nuance. Not that I have fully read them yet, I will try to stay the course, not to mention other threads.
6-11-12
Inconvenient Try-Angle !
NOW w/ Corny Copy Ah. "Mind the Gaffe(added 6-13)": "food fight"
Verse us Tony TruthyahKnow.
** anachronism approved: "Perspective" was Norman Goldman's word of the day(Thursday). "Scale" was my suggestion(for Friday), and "pernicious" was my word for Monday.
6-12-12
Curb Your Enthusiasm !
[Duct Tape? Goose Pate!]
[(Middle - Name / N SC ?)]
[ Bubble Up]
6-13-12
Jeb Bush: Walk Back ?
(Hardball)
*** link(s) added
McCain sabotage.
NOW "Picking up the Tab".
6-14-12
Keep the Change!
"Different Visions" NOW!
Past is prologue or (unpassed)Middle - Name.(Scroll-up)
Happy Birthday to us!
The Dickens We Say!
Better to look back than go back!
Preemptive Comment this AM: Obama battles for Fiscal Reality!
Geitner is speaking on Andrea Mitchell Reports.
Andrea Mitchell pulls Geitner's leg on Romney, but he doesn't bite.
Romney wants to get it done. He doesn't want to look back, he wants to Re-Right! If we look back we will see his Re-Write.
Overhang of Obamacare?
It's coming back?
[Not to mention "No New Taxes"! Old taxes will do fine.]
Segue: Presidents Speech to be inserted later.
[Thom Hartmann Couples Counseling/Next President will take credit for "breaking up" better economy.] Talk is cheap?
Of course.
Stay the course.
The private* sector is fine
verse US economic turn around.
[Hardball Metaphor. Making the case.***]
* E. G. Private Equity Government
(The nuts and bolts? If Romney cannot understand that the economy has turned around, then what will happen when he turns it around.)
[Ouch ! ]
[Politics Nation ? ]
[Whip Republicans with Reagan and Clinton!]
Thom Hartmann?
Word of tomorrow? Pernicious.**
[Coffee Table This! The Fifth Element.]
6-10-12 Keep the Change!
Yes this is a bumper sticker for Obama! Though the links may be a bumper sticker for Clinton or nuance. Not that I have fully read them yet, I will try to stay the course, not to mention other threads.
6-11-12
Inconvenient Try-Angle !
NOW w/ Corny Copy Ah. "Mind the Gaffe(added 6-13)": "food fight"
Verse us Tony TruthyahKnow.
** anachronism approved: "Perspective" was Norman Goldman's word of the day(Thursday). "Scale" was my suggestion(for Friday), and "pernicious" was my word for Monday.
6-12-12
Curb Your Enthusiasm !
[Duct Tape? Goose Pate!]
[(Middle - Name / N SC ?)]
[ Bubble Up]
6-13-12
Jeb Bush: Walk Back ?
(Hardball)
*** link(s) added
McCain sabotage.
NOW "Picking up the Tab".
6-14-12
Keep the Change!
"Different Visions" NOW!
Past is prologue or (unpassed)Middle - Name.(Scroll-up)
Happy Birthday to us!
The Dickens We Say!
Better to look back than go back!
Preemptive Comment this AM: Obama battles for Fiscal Reality!
Geitner is speaking on Andrea Mitchell Reports.
Andrea Mitchell pulls Geitner's leg on Romney, but he doesn't bite.
Romney wants to get it done. He doesn't want to look back, he wants to Re-Right! If we look back we will see his Re-Write.
Overhang of Obamacare?
It's coming back?
[Not to mention "No New Taxes"! Old taxes will do fine.]
Segue: Presidents Speech to be inserted later.
[Thom Hartmann Couples Counseling/Next President will take credit for "breaking up" better economy.] Talk is cheap?
GPS Cross Rhodes
Not to be unkind, but certainly inkind.
Global Partisan Shifting. Or Graphic Pundit Sorting.
Not exactly a vision thing, but more nearly a ge-oh-metric.
Speaking of "Perspective" the NG word of the day(yesterday), I suggest "scales" for today.
The scale that determines rulers, waits and balances, not to mention fish and eye impairments.
Speak of the hockey puck.
[Segue "War on Soda" The un-COLA and Bubble-up?]
Not to mention Martin Bashir, Fight Club yet to rant. Romney mocks jobs list. If the private sector has turned around what will Raw Money do about it. Ouch Super Bowl metaphor.
Global Partisan Shifting. Or Graphic Pundit Sorting.
Not exactly a vision thing, but more nearly a ge-oh-metric.
Speaking of "Perspective" the NG word of the day(yesterday), I suggest "scales" for today.
The scale that determines rulers, waits and balances, not to mention fish and eye impairments.
Speak of the hockey puck.
[Segue "War on Soda" The un-COLA and Bubble-up?]
Not to mention Martin Bashir, Fight Club yet to rant. Romney mocks jobs list. If the private sector has turned around what will Raw Money do about it. Ouch Super Bowl metaphor.
Tony Baloney
Awaiting remarks by the President** on Jansing & Co.* it is not exacty sauce age making.
Appropriate follow up.
Job / Race .
NOW with... doom and gloom. If Romney wants to turn the country around, he doesn't get economics, private, public, or change. Keep the change! The Mitt-flop of stay the course of goose and gander.
* Tag Team
** White House
Appropriate follow up.
Job / Race .
NOW with... doom and gloom. If Romney wants to turn the country around, he doesn't get economics, private, public, or change. Keep the change! The Mitt-flop of stay the course of goose and gander.
* Tag Team
** White House
Thursday, June 07, 2012
Simon says...
Going Off Script* ?**
Material dialogue.***
* Jansing & Co. : Gov. Rendell(**) nails it!
(links to be added)
** Ctrl F "Speaking of PEG'd" line of links(4)
*** Redrawing Battle Lines (Pelosi letter.)
[There is no script, there is only politics. The job and the race.]
[related(?): not fully viewed posturing? hard work!]
6-8-12 TONEY BALONEY?
[ANACHRO-SEGUE: Scott Walker the Anti-Palin in terms of terms. Wisconsin is the Republican's Egypt. Raw Money(*) is America's Syria. The battle field is the point. Clinton and frank oh files of ge-oh-me-try. Neo-Pythagorean. Not exactly sauce age making. Nor pate cake.
(*) Romney
(**) oops (not there yet)
Material dialogue.***
* Jansing & Co. : Gov. Rendell(**) nails it!
(links to be added)
** Ctrl F "Speaking of PEG'd" line of links(4)
*** Redrawing Battle Lines (Pelosi letter.)
[There is no script, there is only politics. The job and the race.]
[related(?): not fully viewed posturing? hard work!]
6-8-12 TONEY BALONEY?
[ANACHRO-SEGUE: Scott Walker the Anti-Palin in terms of terms. Wisconsin is the Republican's Egypt. Raw Money(*) is America's Syria. The battle field is the point. Clinton and frank oh files of ge-oh-me-try. Neo-Pythagorean. Not exactly sauce age making. Nor pate cake.
(*) Romney
(**) oops (not there yet)
Wednesday, June 06, 2012
WWW Wisconsin Lesson?
Wisconsin Walker Walk-out not Winner.
Focus on Mittle? Jansing & Co.
Radical over-reach was the money message
Romney can't run.
Wisconsin issues are national temp late.
Money mess age matters.
It's the stupid economics.
Tag team of dialogue* is message for the mess age.
Morgon Freeman on physics lesson.
Chris Jansing on journalism/economics lesson?
http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20120604/US.Wisconsin.Recall/?cid=hero_media_sea
http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20120606/US.Battleground.Wisconsin/?cid=hero_media_sea
http://news.yahoo.com/whatever-walkers-fate-obama-leads-romney-wisco-213721900--abc-news-politics.html
Clinton is not Obama's Trump.
Is Jansing CBS's Rose?
*Obama's joker? Not!
Clinton is America's stand-up scholar.
Not so sure about Jansing's guests being voice of God!
Speaking of missing links, technical difficulties lost more than a few Re: Lean Forward.
The Place for Politics is (a missing link**) and the place for Share-Un-Angle and Ronald Reagan Jr.
** hour between*** Chuck and Chris
Owe the Iron Knee?
[Martin Bashir and goose or gander.]
[Romney answer Rachel Maddow maybe?]
*** found 6-7-12(not exactly)
Focus on Mittle? Jansing & Co.
Radical over-reach was the money message
Romney can't run.
Wisconsin issues are national temp late.
Money mess age matters.
It's the stupid economics.
Tag team of dialogue* is message for the mess age.
Morgon Freeman on physics lesson.
Chris Jansing on journalism/economics lesson?
http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20120604/US.Wisconsin.Recall/?cid=hero_media_sea
http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20120606/US.Battleground.Wisconsin/?cid=hero_media_sea
http://news.yahoo.com/whatever-walkers-fate-obama-leads-romney-wisco-213721900--abc-news-politics.html
Clinton is not Obama's Trump.
Is Jansing CBS's Rose?
*Obama's joker? Not!
Clinton is America's stand-up scholar.
Not so sure about Jansing's guests being voice of God!
Speaking of missing links, technical difficulties lost more than a few Re: Lean Forward.
The Place for Politics is (a missing link**) and the place for Share-Un-Angle and Ronald Reagan Jr.
** hour between*** Chuck and Chris
Owe the Iron Knee?
[Martin Bashir and goose or gander.]
[Romney answer Rachel Maddow maybe?]
*** found 6-7-12(not exactly)
Tuesday, June 05, 2012
The Place for Politics
Not Here!
Not * today!
Not maybe!
On Wisconsin !**
*literally here?
** ironically not here
See above "here"* and below.
Moo ! ? ! ? !
But seriously, time will tell.
Sea calm post or !
[Now that's the ticket! NBC calls it for Walker!]
http://nbcpolitics.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/05/12074595-walker-emerges-victorious-in-wisconsin-recall?lite
http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/157021215.html
http://ed.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/05/12075115-breaking-wisconsin-gov-scott-walker-survives-recall-effort-nbc-news-projects?lite
http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/05/msnbc-declares-obama-winner-of-the-wisconsin-recall/
The Last Word
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699472#47699472
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47699492
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47699616
The Ed Show
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700234
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700147 flabbergasted
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700133
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700014
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47699860
Rachel Maddow
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700439
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700436
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700394
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700531
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47699730
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47683830
Hardball?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3096434/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/ns/msnbc_tv-hardball_with_chris_matthews/
Not * today!
Not maybe!
On Wisconsin !**
*literally here?
** ironically not here
See above "here"* and below.
Moo ! ? ! ? !
But seriously, time will tell.
Sea calm post or !
[Now that's the ticket! NBC calls it for Walker!]
http://nbcpolitics.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/05/12074595-walker-emerges-victorious-in-wisconsin-recall?lite
http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/157021215.html
http://ed.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/05/12075115-breaking-wisconsin-gov-scott-walker-survives-recall-effort-nbc-news-projects?lite
http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/05/msnbc-declares-obama-winner-of-the-wisconsin-recall/
The Last Word
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699472#47699472
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47699492
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47699616
The Ed Show
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700234
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700147 flabbergasted
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700133
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700014
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47699860
Rachel Maddow
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700439
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700436
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700394
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47700531
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47699730
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/vp/47699492#47683830
Hardball?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3096434/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/ns/msnbc_tv-hardball_with_chris_matthews/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)